Which statement about the motion to table is accurate?

Which statement about the motion to table is accurate?

• A. It permanently ends consideration of the motion.
• B. It requires unanimous consent to take the item up again.
• C. It changes the agenda and the time of meeting.
• D. It creates a temporary halt and keeps the motion in its original form.

Answer: (D)

The key idea is that a motion to table temporarily sets aside the current matter without changing it or ending it. It creates a pause, not a permanent decision, and the motion remains in its original form so it can be taken up again later. This is different from a motion that would end discussion for good or that would alter the agenda or timing. Because the item is simply postponed, it can be brought back into consideration when the assembly decides to “take from the table.” That’s why the statement that it creates a temporary halt and keeps the motion in its original form is the correct description.

The key idea is that a motion to table temporarily sets aside the current matter without changing it or ending it. It creates a pause, not a permanent decision, and the motion remains in its original form so it can be taken up again later. This is different from a motion that would end discussion for good or that would alter the agenda or timing. Because the item is simply postponed, it can be brought back into consideration when the assembly decides to “take from the table.” That’s why the statement that it creates a temporary halt and keeps the motion in its original form is the correct description.