Which motion is described as not significant or intended to delay or obstruct business?

Which motion is described as not significant or intended to delay or obstruct business?

• A. Frivolous Motion
• B. Main Motion
• C. Motion to Amend
• D. Point of Order

Answer: (A)

The idea being tested is recognizing a motion that has little merit and is often used to stall proceedings. A frivolous motion is exactly that: it lacks substance and is typically brought forward without any real aim to advance the group’s business. In practice, such motions are viewed as improper because they waste time and disrupt progress, and the chair or the assembly can rule them as out of order or quickly dispose of them. This fits the description best because the other options describe legitimate tools for conducting business: the main motion is the proposal being considered; a motion to amend is used to change that proposal; a point of order is a procedural question about enforcing rules. The term that captures a motion with no meaningful purpose and that you’d expect to be discouraged as a potential delay matches the concept of a frivolous motion.

The idea being tested is recognizing a motion that has little merit and is often used to stall proceedings. A frivolous motion is exactly that: it lacks substance and is typically brought forward without any real aim to advance the group’s business. In practice, such motions are viewed as improper because they waste time and disrupt progress, and the chair or the assembly can rule them as out of order or quickly dispose of them.

This fits the description best because the other options describe legitimate tools for conducting business: the main motion is the proposal being considered; a motion to amend is used to change that proposal; a point of order is a procedural question about enforcing rules. The term that captures a motion with no meaningful purpose and that you’d expect to be discouraged as a potential delay matches the concept of a frivolous motion.